#CitizenScience #ThinkTank Meeting #3

Kapiti Coast, Dec 2018

Ben Knight from Guardians of the Kāpiti Marine Reserve about to head out with Nicole Miller (not pictured) to carry out a Reef Life survey

The third meeting once again brought together a cross section of citizen science practitioners, researchers, coordinators and designers in the Capital – Wellington. Summarising discussions spanning on ground works to governance and just about everything in between is challenging, especially given participants’ diverse experiences and views. Community-based environmental monitoring covering marine, terrestrial and freshwater environments as well as education, taxonomy, advocacy and extension/training (let alone interactions and influences between each) represent just some of the groups’ interests.

The goals of the informal 2-hr meeting were (1) to update the 11 participants on individual and organisation-led activities underway and planned, and (2) progress actions identified in Think Tank Meetings #1 and #2. Face to face network building speeds up conversations and solidifies a community of practice. Importantly, coming together helps minimise duplication between citizen science projects. The field in NZ is fast-paced and resourcing for project development and delivery is very limited.

Coastal Restoration Trust

A snap shot of the Coast Restoration Trust’s comprehensive reference database: providing restoration practitioners with science to support their activities

Building a platform for the Think Tank

The Think Tank is grounded in 3 years of cit sci workshops, research and projects, all of which recognised the need for a more connected and cohesive approach was needed to further the field in NZ. The formation of an association (as per Australia, Asia, the US and Europe) creates a functional structure for the Think Tank to operate within. Formalisation (e.g., through incorporation) is also a criterion for many funders. With a draft charter being produced by Shane Orchard (University of Canterbury/ Consultant), Think Tank participants will collaboratively define and refine aims, and what form governance and membership will take. These will be outlined in Think Tank #4 blog.

·   Establish a core group of participants
·  Encourage participation from others to ensure different facets of cit sci are included
·   Encourage participation (one-off or ongoing) of organisations and individuals who can provide diverse skills and perspectives
·   Encourage participation of strategic partners who can broaden the reach of the Think Tank
·   Be a recognised source of expertise on cit sci in NZ
Predator Free NZ National Map

Predator Free NZ Trust National Map of control efforts around the country

A multi-level Think Tank

Practical activities carried out by the Think Tank will focus on advocacy and action. The former will be targeted at funders and government, and the latter at a broader audience (e.g., community groups, researchers, project coordinators, educators). The following examples will be fleshed out as the Think Tank and Association evolve.

Advocating for issues on behalf of NZ citizen scientists 

  • Using the dearth of taxonomists as an example, Siobhan (citizen science super volunteer) emphasized advocating for creating expertise necessary to support citizen scientists in their work.
  • Markus Luzcak Roesch (Victoria University Wellington) the lack incentives for engage junior faculty at Universities in citizen science initiatives, as the reward system only recognises publications and grants received.
  • Peter Handford (Groundtruth) discussed developing a set of principles for citizen science project creation.

Embedding citizen science into existing events

Shane Orchard advocated for embedding citizen science topics into within conference/ symposia/ workshops as is beginning to occur more often. Examples include the NZFWSS (aforementioned) and NZ Ecological Society conferences. The National Wetland Trust and Coastal Restoration Trust biennial and annual symposia are further examples of regular events that showcase cit sci initiatives strengthen cit sci credibility and build practical skills (e.g., environmental monitoring).

SHMAK invertebrate survey

SHMAK invertebrate survey

The Think Tank online

The Facebook page (developed for the NZ Landcare Trust Cit Sci Symposium) will be realigned to support the society, once formalisation has been achieved. Plans are afoot to develop a general website to house the society and Think Tank and to link with other web-based citizen science hubs – … watch this space!

  • Markus Luzcak Roesch is part of team that has developed resources for teachers linked to the science curriculum. The Science Learning Hub (a project partner) will operate as the go-to site for cit sci in primary, intermediate and secondary education providers. Resources will include a unit plan template for teachers that can be adapted to suit end users and video interviews describing successes – and failures, to support teacher learning.
  • Shane Orchard is leading the development of a Taranaki hub to support local citizen science initiatives, which could be upscaled for projects throughout NZ.

Open data/data commons

Peter Handford highlighted the limited application of open data principles and described the collaborative model of Trap.NZ (a predator trap-catch data management platform). The model, which shares IP with key users, drives a focus on public good, the practicalities of data sharing and re-use, and ultimately gives long term control outside of private business. Siobhan Leachman combs the web for open source text and images in the course of her voluntary work with the Smithsonian Institution and as a Wikipedia editor. She urged Think Tank participants to ensure all images and other media uploaded are licensed for open use (e.g., CC BY-SA 3.0)

Auckland Community Ecological Monitoring Guide

Auckland Community Ecological Monitoring Guide: A framework for selecting monitoring methods

Creating resources

Liz Gibson (EMR, Wellington) reflected on the recent NZ Freshwater Science Society Conference, where a special session was dedicated to the Stream Health Monitoring and Assessment Kit. The original kit was developed in 2002 (Biggs et al). Richard Storey (NIWA) is leading the current SHMAK upgrade which will include an online database (being development by Groundtruth). Calls were also made at the conference to develop a lake monitoring kit for community groups based on the successful Florida Lakewatch model. Monica Peters (people+science) briefly outlined a new ecological monitoring guide for community groups which enables groups to critically evaluate which monitoring method(s) would best suit their project aims and group capacity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s